documents: 94
This data as json
| rowid | docid | page_count | pdf_db_path | pdf_db_id | pdf_db_content_hash | txt_db_path | txt_db_id | txt_db_content_hash | hrg_type | year | month | day | dt_source | hrg_no | accused | matched_uid | hrg_text | title | agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 1c3b7b0a | 6 | /PPACT/meeting-minutes-extraction/export/pdf/1c3b7b0a.pdf | id:8ceKnrnmgi0AAAAAAAAqoQ | 3f56e4afab549455202c0849c9bac664e2b7ee6533ce85d29f1497434d3b025f | /PPACT/meeting-minutes-extraction/export/txt/1c3b7b0a.txt | id:8ceKnrnmgi0AAAAAAAAr6w | 44e70dc3b0da5aee28c1a878d9c29016ffc4732aae78dd01d5fc6ee1197098ea | police | 2010 | 4 | 19 | scraped | 2 | Appellant was employed by the Kenner Police Department as a permanent police officer. By written communication dated January 28, 2010, with an effective date of January 28, 2010, he was notified of his suspension, termination, and removal on three separate personnel action forms corresponding to three separate investigations for violating the following policies: Personnel Action Form Number One (IAD Item Number 200911052) DR 20-2, Article 26 - Personal Conduct DR 20-2, Article 29.1 - Mandatory Disclosure DR 20-2, Article 50.2 - Conduct Unbecoming an Officer DR 20-2, Article 52 - Instructions from an Authoritative Source DR 20-2, Article 54 - Disobedience of Orders DR 20-2, Article 75 - Abuse of Position DR 20-2, Article 82 - Interfering with Lawful Activities DR 20-12, Article Ill - Unsatisfactory Performance Personnel Action Form Number Two (IAD Item Number 200911010) DR 20-2, Article 26 - Personal Conduct DR 20-2, Article 28 - Courtesy DR 20-2, Article33 - Criticism DR 20-2, Article 50.1 - Insubordination DR 20-2, Article 27 - Adherence to Law DR 20-12, Article Ill - Unsatisfactory Performance Personnel Action Form Number Three (IAD Item Number 200911051) DR 20-2, Article 26 - Personal Conduct DR 20-2, Article 37 - Accepting, Giving Anything of Value DR 20-2, Article43 - Solicitations Relative to Duty DR 20-2, Article 50.2 - Conduct Unbecoming an Officer DR 20-2, Article 82 - Interfering with Lawful Activities DR 20-2, Article 75 - Abuse of Position DR 20-12, Article Ill - Unsatisfactory Performance Appellant filed a timely appeal within 15 days of receipt of the written reason for the disciplinary action. A public hearing was held at 5:30 p.m. on April 19, 2010. Police Officer Calvin Prevou was present without counsel. Lieutenant Douglas Dodt and Sergeant Michael Glaser were present with Attorney Philip Boudousque. Personnel Action Form Number Three (IAD Item Number 200911051) was the first appeal discussed. Minutes — April 19, 2010 Page 2 of 6 The following witnesses testified: Police Chief Stephen Caraway; Witness for the Police Department Jamie Williams; Witness for the Police Department Brandon Lefort; Witness for the Police Department Michele Williams Prevou; Witness for Mr. Prevou Brooke Williams; Witness for Mr. Prevou Piere Lombardino; Witness for Mr. Prevou The following exhibits were presented: Kenner Police Department Exhibits 1. IAD Item Number 200911051 Mr. Prevou waived his right to testify. e At this time a motion was made by David Desforges and seconded by John Tetlow to go into exeoullve session to discuss the character of the appellant, with no objection by Mr. Votes were cast as follows: Those in Favor: David Desforges, Dominick Impastato, John Tetlow, and Thomas Linn Those Opposed: None Those Absent: None Those Abstained: None Motion Carries. The Vice-Chairman called the meeting back to order. Since Mr. Prevou waived his right to testify, Ms. Driscoll read Mr. Prevou’s original statement to Internal Affairs regarding the incident into the record. Parties were allowed to make any final statements and/or arguments. e Amotion was made by Dominick Impastato and seconded by David Desforges to sustain the actions of the Police Department, as the Chief of Police acted in good faith and for just cause in the issuance of the disciplinary action. Votes were cast as follows: Those in Favor: David Desforges, Dominick Impastato, John Tetlow, and Thomas Linn Those Opposed: None Those Absent: None Those Abstained: None Motion Carries. Minutes — April 19, 2010 Page 3 of 6 Mr. Prevou decided to withdraw the appeal of Personnel Action Form Number One (IAD Item Number 200911052) as well as the appeal of Personnel Action Form Number Two (IAD Item Number 200911010). e A motion was made by David Desforges and seconded by Dominick Impastato to dismiss Mr. Prevou’s appeal of Personnel Action Form Number One (IAD Item Number 200911052) as well as the appeal of Personnel Action Form Number Two (IAD Item Number 200911010). Votes were cast as follows: Those in Favor: David Desforges, Dominick Impastato, John Tetlow, and Thomas Linn Those Opposed: None Those Absent: None Those Abstained: None Motion Carries. | Appeal hearing: (unknown) on 2010-4-19 | kenner-pd |