documents: 14
This data as json
| rowid | docid | page_count | pdf_db_path | pdf_db_id | pdf_db_content_hash | txt_db_path | txt_db_id | txt_db_content_hash | hrg_type | year | month | day | dt_source | hrg_no | accused | matched_uid | hrg_text | title | agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 07f469a3 | 13 | /PPACT/meeting-minutes-extraction/export/pdf/07f469a3.pdf | id:8ceKnrnmgi0AAAAAAAA-bw | 830685f76311ddd345f0cc149a9277ef7e7bb25afdefcb20a896b54be603e2e2 | /PPACT/meeting-minutes-extraction/export/txt/07f469a3.txt | id:8ceKnrnmgi0AAAAAAAA-cA | 75c77db700eaa0f5bc3b1af08bde9021b52a00d3048658e712be4f325e092096 | unknown | 2018 | 12 | 12 | scraped | 1 | 4. LETTER FROM PCO I, VICKIE DAVIS, DATED OCTOBER 31, 2018, REQUESTING AN | d3954ec7467df111d875b161b863dcca | 4. LETTER FROM PCO I, VICKIE DAVIS, DATED OCTOBER 31, 2018, REQUESTING AN APPEAL HEARING-LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION, DOCKET 2018-003 ON OCTOBER 18, 2018, PCO IT VICKIE DAVIS WAS NOTIFIED BY HER SUPERVISOR, CAROL BOWDEN, SHE WAS RECEIVING A LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION WHICH STATED MS. DAVIS HAD VIOLATED THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION 2-DUTY TO KNOW AND COMPLY-PARAGRAPH A-THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE CODE OF CONDUCT, THE GENERAL ORDERS AND ALL OTHER ORDERS, POLICIES AND DIRECTIVES ISSUED BY PROPER AUTHORITY. SPECIFICALLY ON 10/16/2018, AT 2032 HOURS, MS. DAVIS RECEIVED A CALL FROM A FEMALE WHO STATED SHE HAD HIT A POLE IN THE PARKING LOT OF BURGER KING, 1985 AIRLINE DR. THE CALLER ADVISED MS. DAVIS SHE DID NOT KNOW WHAT TYPE OF POLE SHE HAD HIT AND DID NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO. MS. DAVIS ASKED IF SHE NEEDED MEDICAL ATTENTION AND THE CALLER STATED NO BUT SHE WAS REALLY SHAKEN UP. MS. DAVIS ADVISED THE CALLER SHE WOULD SEND AN OFFICER TO CONTACT HER. MS. DAVIS ADVISED THE CALLER TO GO INSIDE TO GIVE HER INFORMATION TO THE BUSINESS. ON OCTOBER 31, 2018, THIS BOARD RECEIVED A LETTER FROM MS. DAVIS REQUESTING AN APPEAL HEARING REGARDING THIS LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION. ALL PARTIES WERE ADVISED OF MS. DAVIS APPEAL REQUEST. PAGE 4 DECEMBER 12, 2018 ON DECEMBER 3, 2018, ALL PARTIES WERE ADVISED MS. DAVIS LETTER OF REQUEST WOULD BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE DECEMBER 12, 2018, BOARD MEETING. BY SGT. BRIDGES MOTION MADE TO ACCEPT PCO I, VICKIE DAVIS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 31, 2018, REQUESTING AN APPEAL HEARING FOR LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION DOCKET # 2018-003. COMMENTS: MR. LOWE STATES, THERE IS NO BASIS FOR ANY ACTION AS THERE IS NO DISCIPLINARY OR CORRECTIVE ACTION IN THIS MATTER, JUST A LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION. MS. DAVIS STATES SHE WAS TOLD IT WOULD BE IN HER PERSONNEL FILE FOR THREE YEARS. THERE IS DISCUSSION AMONG THE BOARD MEMBERS, MR. LOWE, CHIEF McWILLIAMS AND MS. DAVIS REGARDING WHERE THE LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION IS STORED AND FOR HOW LONG. CHIEF McWILLIAMS AND MR.LOWE ADVISE THE BOARD THE LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION IS NOT PLACED IN MS. DAVIS PERSONNEL FILE IT IS STORED WITH INTERNAL AFFAIRS AND WILL REMAIN THERE FOR THREE (3) YEARS THEN REMOVED. THE BOARD IS ADVISED THE LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION IS IN NO WAY USED AGAINST MS. DAVIS WITH HER EMPLOYMENT WITH THE BOSSIER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT NOR WOULDIT BE USED AGAINST HER FOR ANY OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT. CAPT.SHELTON ASKS IF IT STAYS IN HER PERSONNEL FILE FOR THREE YEARS? CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES IT IS NOT IN HER PERSONNEL FILE BUT YES SECRETARY MURRAY ASKS WHO MADE THE SECOND CAPT. SHELTON STATES HE MADE THE SECOND MR. DAVIS ASKS WHAT ARE WE SECONDING FOR? CAPT. SHELTON STATE NUMBER 4. SGT. BRIDGES STATES HE WILL START OVER BY SGT. BRIDGES MOTION MADE TO ACCEPT LETTER FROM PCO IT VICKIE DAVIS, DATED OCTOBER 31, 2018, REQUESTING AN APPEAL HEARING, LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION DOCKET # 2018-003 SECOND BY CAPT. SHELTON VOTING IN FAVOR: ALL SEE ATTACHMENTS MR.SCHWARTZ STATES LETTER FROM SGT. CHRIS ESTESS SECRETARY MURRAY ASKS IF THE BOARD IS GIVING HER AN APPEAL? CHIEF McWILLIAMS ASKS IF THERE IS AN APPEAL? PAGE 5 DECEMBER 12, 2018 MR.SCHWARTZ STATES THEY ARE JUST ACCEPTING THE LETTER. IT IS UP TO THE BOARD TO DETERMINE WHETHER WE ACCEPT HER REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING. WE NEED A MOTION TO EITHER ACCEPT HER REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING OR DENY HER REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING FOR JANUARY 16, 2019. SECRETARY MURRAY STATES THE NEXT BOARD MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 16, 2019. BY SGT. BRIDGES MOTION MADE TO ACCEPT PCO IT VICKIE DAVIS REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING AND TAKE A VOTE ON WHETHER WE WANT TO ACCEPT IT OR DENY IT MR.SCHWARTZ STATES WE HAVE ALREADY VOTED TO ACCEPT THE DOCUMENTATION WE NEED TO HAVE SOMEONE MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT HER REQUEST FOR AN APPEAL HEARING FOR JANUARY 16, 2019. MR. CHANDLER STATES IF NOTHING IS HAPPENING WHY DO WE NEED TO HEAR AN APPEAL? CAPT. SHELTON STATES WE ARE JUST VOTING YES OR NO MR. DAVIS ASKS WHAT IS SHE APPEALING? SGT. BRIDGES STATES SHE FEELS IT IS DISCIPLINARY AND THE CITY SAYS IT ISN’T, IT IS A LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION MR. CHANDLER STATES THEN THAT IS WHY EVERYONE IS HERE TODAY SO WE CAN DO IT IN THE OPEN? IS THAT WHY EVERYONE IS HERE TODAY? MR.SCHWARTZ STATES IT IS AN INFORMAL MEETING FOR DISCUSSION, SO YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK QUESTIONS. HE FURTHER STATES THE BOARD HAS ACCEPTED THE LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION SO IT IS UP TO THE BOARD TO MAKE A MOTION TO HAVE AN APPEAL OR NOT TO HAVE AN APPEAL MR. DAVIS STATES IN THE PAST WE HAD HEARINGS ABOUT DIFFERENT THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED, AT CERTAIN TIMES THINGS THAT HAVE HAPPENED HAVE COME UP ABOUT LETTERS IN PEOPLES FILES AND IS THIS ONE OF THOSE LETTERS, THAT IS A STRIKE AGAINST AN OFFICER? MR.SCHWARTZ STATES THIS LETTER IS NOT IN HER PERSONNEL FILE, RIGHT CHIEF? MR.LOWE STATES IT DOES NOT GO IN THE PERSONNEL FILE. HE STATES THERE ARE LETTERS OF REPRIMAND THAT CAN BE ISSUED AS ONE OF THE FIRST STEPS OF A DISCIPLINARY PROBLEM AND A LETTER OF REPRIMAND IS PUT IN THE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL FILE AND THAT DISCIPLINARY STAYS WITH THE EMPLOYEE. THIS WAS NOT A LETTER OF REPRIMAND IT WAS A LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION-DOCUMENTING JUST WHAT OCCURRED. HE STATES SHE REFUSED TO SIGN THE LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION AS SHE DOES NOT AGREE WITH IT AND SHE ASKED FOR AN INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION WHICH WAS DONE AND FOUND THE INCIDENT DID OCCUR AND THAT WAS THE END OF IT. BUT IT IS NOT GOING INTO HER PERSONNEL FILE AND IN A COUPLE OF YEARS IT WILL BE PURGED FROM THAT FILE. MR. DAVIS STATES THE ONLY REASON HE IS ASKING IS BECAUSE HE FINDS IT HARD TO VOTE ON SOMETHING HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT. SGT. BRIDGES ASKS, THE LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION, YOU USE THEM AS A FORM OF PROGRESSIVE PUNISHMENT. RIGHT? CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES NO. PAGE 6 DECEMBER 12, 2018 BRIDGES STATES, YOU DON’T? CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES NO, A REPRIMAND SGT. BRIDGES STATES, REPRIMAND? MR. DAVIS ASKS IF ALL THE INFORMATION FROM THESE LETTERS IS IT CORRECT? HER LETTER IS IT FACTUAL OR IS IT NOT AND AS FAR AS THE LETTER SHE SUBMITTED MR.SCHWARTZ STATES IT IS HIS UNDERSTANDING IT IS NOT A LETTER OF REPRIMAND, DOES NOT GO IN HER PERSONNEL FILE, IT IS A LETTER OF REPRIMAND AND IT WILL BE PURGED IN 2-3 YEARS CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES THREE YEARS CAPT. SHELTON STATES IT IS NOT A LETTER OF REPRIMAND. MR SCHWARTZ STATES IT IS ALETTER OF DOCUMENTATION SO IT WILL NOT HAVE AFFECT ON EMPLOYMENT OUTSIDE THE STATION. CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES NO. MS. DAVIS STATES THAT IT WILL HAVE AFFECT ON HER EMPLOYMENT HERE. THEY WILL PULL IT OUT AND SAY YOU DID THIS. YOU SEE WHAT I AM SAYING? MR.SCHWARTZ STATES HE UNDERSTANDS WHAT SHE IS SAYING MS. DAVIS STATES IT IS NOT CORRECT WHAT... INAUDIBLE...THAT IS MY ISSUE. PEOPLE SAY IT IS ONLY A LETTER OF DOCUMENTATION, IT IS STILL A LETTER. THAT IS MY PROBLEM MR.CHANDLER STATES, YOU KNOW THAT HAPPENS A LOT WHEN YOU RUN A BUSINESS. YOU ARE NOT ALWAYS GOING TO AGREE WITH THE BOSS. I AM NOT HERE TO RUN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THAT IS THE CHIEF’S JOB ANDI UNDERSTAND WHY AT TIMES HE NEEDS LETTERS OF DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW YOU HAVEN’T BEEN THE PERFECT PERSON ALL THE TIME, NOT NECESSARILY IN YOUR CASE BUT IN ALL, YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME BACKUP IN CASE IT DID HAPPEN. THIS IS JUST A NORMAL CASE OF RUNNING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. MS. SCHWARTZ ALSO STATES IT INDICATES POLICY AND PROCEDURES. MS. DAVIS STATES, RIGHT. MR.SCHWARTZ STATES THAT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE THIS DEPARMENT. CORRECT? MS. DAVIS STATES YES SIR MR.SCHWARTZ STATES EVERYONE HAS READ THE SITUATION ABOUT THE INCIDENT AND THE VIOLATION OF THE POLICY MR.LOWE I THINK YOU MADE THE STATEMENT ABOUT HOW THEY WERE GOING TO CONTINUE TO DISCUSS COMING TO A RESOLUTION ON THIS, ARE THEY STILL DOING THAT? CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES, DO WHAT NOW? SGT. BRIDGES STATES, WHAT DID YOU SAY EARLIER-YOU SAID THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS AND COMING TO A RESOLUTION ON IT, ABOUT GOING THIS FAR. CHIEF McWILLIAMS STATES, THIS IS OVER PAGE 7 DECEMBER 12, 2018 SGT. BRIDGES STATES, OK THERE IS NO MORE TALKING ABOUT IT? MR.SCHWARTZ STATES WE WILL NEED TO HAVE A MOTION TO ALLOW AN APPEAL OR NOT TO ALLOW AN APPEAL BY SGT. BRIDGES MOTION MADE TO VOTE WHETHER WE ARE GOING TO HAVE AN APPEAL HEARING FOR PCO IT VICKIE DAVIS CAPT. SHELTON STATES MAKE THE MOTION TO HAVE AN APPEAL HEARING AND EVERYONE CAN VOTE YES OR NO BY SGT. BRIDGES MOTION MADE TO HAVE AN APPEAL HEARING FOR PCO II VICKIE DAVIS. SECOND BY CAPT. SHELTON COMMENTS: NONE VOTING IN FAVOR: SGT.BRIDGES VOTING AGAINST: MR.SCHWARTZ,MR.CHANDLER, MR. DAVIS, CAPT. SHELTON SEE ATTACHMENTS MS. DAVIS APPEAL HEARING REQUEST IS DENIED. | Appeal hearing: 4. LETTER FROM PCO I, VICKIE DAVIS, DATED OCTOBER 31, 2018, REQUESTING AN on 2018-12-12 |